Home| News | Classifieds| Newsletter | Subscribe | Contact Us| Sitemap| Weather | Business Listings | Real Estate | Cars | Jobs Calendar| Friend | Follow | Feed |
|
|
|
Featured BrokersPrinceton Real Estate |
Comments are limited to 200 words or less. Rap wrote on Jul 8, 2009 2:34 PM: " First off, I doubt anyone in Pennington pays $120,000 in taxes. Second, property owners pay the same property taxes as everyone else (school district, municipal, fire, county, etc) regardless of whether they have 0, 1, or 100 kids in a school system. This is true even in the case where a property is rented to someone who has kids in the school system or not. Presumably, a landlord will "bake" their taxes into the rent charged in some fashion. The real problem is my point above, property owners pay the same taxes as everyone else (school district, municipal, fire, county, etc) regardless of whether they have 0, 1, or 100 kids in a school system. The way we fund school districts is extremely inequitable to property owners with no kids in school. Yeah, I know the argument that "someone" paid for taxes when I went to school or when my kids were in school. So what's the solution? Same as for colleges and private schools...everybody should pay based on attendance. Yes, people at lower incomes could be subsidized in some fashion or other, but, if you wanna breed like a rabbit and have 16 kids in the school and I choose to be childless, why should my tax burden be the same as yours??? " Tony wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:29 PM: " It is telling that there never seems to be any mention of how much money would actually be saved by eliminating the nonoperating districts. Perhaps it is because they are not the real problem, but just a diversion so those in Trenton can look like they are doing something. " No Santa Claus Here wrote on Jul 3, 2009 3:33 PM: " Its time for a new law to be added to the books. People who rent apartments or home should pay some type of fee to help with the real estate taxes to pay for sevices , schools and sending their children to our schools for free. Not fair that we the home owner have to pay everything. If a family lives in an apartment with 5 children they send their children to school for free while we as hard working home owners and tax payers have to pay $ 9,000 per child. Get with it...... Children who live with their parents that live on private schools and militery bases send their children to our schools for free , they should pay something. All children have the right to a education but it has to be fair for everyone and not just the property owner. We have a friend who pays $120,000 in real estate taxes in Pennington and gets nothing from the town .Some one has to do something.... " Chuck S wrote on Jul 3, 2009 8:32 AM: " Matt. What waste? The Rocky Hill School Board is entirely volunteer. This is a Corzine "smoke and mirrors trick". This is not about saving money this is about raising taxes! That's all Corzine has accomplished in his tenure. As Main Street wrote, now Rocky Hill should have an opportunity to select which school district they would like to consolidate. " Matt wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:36 PM: " Finally! This will help eliminate all the waste we have here in our state. " Main Street wrote on Jul 2, 2009 3:40 PM: " Another fast one pulled by the Corzine administration. Rocky Hill should now send their kids to Princeton schools as Cranbury does. " Think it through wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:11 PM: " Rocky Hill parents will simply have to accept that for purposes of educating thier children, they are part of Mongomery Township, and they will vote in the election as folks in Montgomery do. Or, they could try and get one seat on the board assigned to their little hamlet, and get an over-sized impact on school board decisions... They were living in a fantasy, now they are in reality - how much sway should 100 kids have over a properly-sized school district? " Add your own comments: Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Although we do not have any obligation to monitor these comments, we reserve the right at all times to check the comments and to remove any information that is unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us at our sole discretion, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We also reserve the right to limit future participation by any user who violates these terms. All threats to systems or site infrastructure shall be assumed genuine in nature and will be reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities |
|
|
|
Kris Kringle wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:37 PM:
Property owners pay taxes, and while the renter may not write a check to the local school district, the owner of the apartment DOES.
Renters do not get off without paying for school, the landlord figures that expense into his rent.
A head tax on school-age children may sound nice, but it is the wrong way to go. Shared support of the education system by all involved is best - if parents could opt-out then the remaining parents would wind up paying private school-like tuition bills.
As for the $120,000/yr property tax bill in Pennington - the tax rate in Pennington is $1.95 per hundred, which would put the value of their property at around $6 Million (if I did my math correct), I grew up in Pennington, and I dopn't think there is a $6 Million property in the borough. Are you sure your friend isn't in Hopewell Township? "